Capturing total steroid burden in patients with atopic dermatitis and asthma.

Background: The cumulative burden of cutaneous, inhaled, intranasal and systemic corticosteroids (CS) in individual patients should be routinely assessed. Methods: Our monitoring tool collected data on CS type, potency, frequency, side effects, interventions and patient counseling in every encounter. Results: 82 AD patients had 151 encounters. Severe AD had more side effects than those without (68.18% vs 41.67% respectively, P < 0.0333). Those with higher TSB had more side effects overall (p < 0.0493). There was also significant positive correlation with higher TSB and the overall number of side effects (p < 0.0116). 101 asthmatics had 193 encounters. Over 50% of asthma patients had other CS. Severe asthmatics had more side effects than those without (62.5% vs 20.8%, p < 0.0001). Patients with higher TSB had more side effects overall (p < 0.0001). There was also significant positive correlation with a higher TSB and the overall number of side effects (p < 0.0001). 80% of AD and 90% of asthma patients were satisfied with the counseling. The EHR in AD and asthma resulted in counseling in 89% and 93% respectively and real-time intervention in 27.8% and 3% respectively. Although patients with side effects had more dose adjustments, those without side effects also warranted adjustments. Physician surveys demonstrated improved satisfaction with the EHR tool over time, and minimal impact on visit time. Conclusion: The utilization of our EHR monitoring tool allows for the identification and tracking of TSB in patients, associated side effects and leads to real-time physician intervention.

A Hands-on Approach to Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing.

Contact dermatitis (CD) is a common skin condition caused by contact with an exogenous agent that elicits an inflammatory response. Although history and physical examination can be helpful in distinguishing between irritant CD and allergic CD (ACD), the gold standard for diagnosing ACD is patch testing. Although the actual patch test (PT) procedure and application is relatively straightforward, the decisions involving which allergens to use, interpretation of results, determination of relevant allergens, and subsequent patient management require more skill and expertise. Often, the distribution of the presenting dermatitis can provide insight into the potential causative allergens and should be taken into account when selecting PT allergens. Commercially available PT panels and personal care products can be used for patch testing. Determining the clinical relevance of PT results is a critical component of the PT procedure. Patients must be educated on avoidance of relevant allergens and given guidance on alternative products available for use. Special populations, including children with ACD and occupational CD, and patients with biomedical devices have unique allergen considerations, and PT panels should be directed as such to address all potential allergens.

Risk stratification of systemic reactions to subcutaneous immunotherapy: A retrospective study.

Background: Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) is a very effective treatment modality; however, it can be associated with both local and systemic reactions (SR). Identifying patient factors that predict SR remains paramount. Objective: Our aim was to identify the rate of SRs to SCIT as well as identify patient risk factors associated with the development of SRs. Methods: We conducted an institutional review board approved 10-year retrospective chart review of 459 patients who received SCIT in our clinic. The patients were placed into cohorts according to age, which included pediatric (5-18 years), adult (19-64 years), and senior (>65 years) patients. Results: An SR (N = 177) was identified in 24.8% of the patients (n = 114). The incidence of SR per injection was 0.2% (177 SRs of 74,183 total injections). SRs were identified as class 1 (n = 152), class 2 (n = 21), class 3 (n = 2), and class 4 (n = 2) according to the 2010 World Allergy Organization's SR grading system. There were no observed differences in the number of SRs with respect to age group. Female patients were more likely to have an SR (p = 0.02) overall as well as more than one reaction (p = 0.002). Other risk factors included the following: a patient-reported history of food allergy (p = 0.05), drug allergy (p = 0.005), or positive skin test result to cat and/or dog (p = 0.01). In addition, patients who were receiving SCIT to cat and/or dog (p = 0.004) or to dust mite (p = 0.03) were more likely to have an SR. Conclusion: In our patient population, the majority of SRs to SCIT occurred in female patients, patients with a history of drug or food allergies, and those who were receiving pet or dust-mite SCIT.